Zamora Cathedral overlooks the Duero. The aceñas (medieval hydraulic plants) and San Claudio's red brick bell gable are visible below. All photos in this post 2018 Jessica Knauss. |
Close up on the aceñas and San Claudio's gable |
San Claudio stands out in the Olivares neighborhood, seen from the city wall |
San Claudio appears to have a Romanesque cathedral bell tower popping out of it, but is otherwise missable from the south. |
The plot thickens on the north side. |
A close look under those characteristic checkerboard eaves reveals that the corbels depict people in typical twelfth-century activities such as harvesting grapes, handfighting, and defecating. (We all do it, but it doesn't usually show up as a decoration on an important building!) A person could look all day and still be finding new surprising details at sundown. And that's not all this open-air museum had to offer.
Although heavily weathered, the entrance archway is one of the most richly decorated in Zamora. The paschal lamb in the innermost arch and probably also the blue paint were placed in the thirteenth century, but the rest was carved by the same masters who made the corbels and the column capitals we'll see in the interior.
The outermost archway has stylized leaves, creating a lacy frill around the edges of the masterpiece. The second arch contains what were once sensitively carved depictions of animals from the medieval bestiary, a sort of field guide to animals of the world and of the imagination. Slightly to the right here, I think I see a human trying to tame a standing ape or a bear as well as a large fishy serpent. Separated by paradisaical leaves and a smaller floral band of blue, the innermost arch is thought to be a calendar of sorts. It shows the emblematic human activity of each month of year, such as warming themselves by the fire, sowing, reaping, hunting with a falcon, and going off to war. The archway in total represents all three levels of life: infernal (animals), terrestrial, and celestial. Having passed under so much symbolism, are you ready for the interior?
The first time I visited San Claudio, I walked in and started snapping away at everything inside such a unique space. I took five or six pictures of the more modern parts of the church before the caretaker approached me to say that I was only allowed to take three photos. (Three? Not zero, one, or two, but three? A holy trinity of photos?) I was left with the impression that I would have to return every week for years, taking three pictures at a time, to get all the shots I wanted.
Portable altar, c. 1600 |
Flemish paintings on copper, 1600s Epiphany and St. Peter released from prison |
The next time I showed up at San Claudio, the caretaker tried to tell me again about the three-photo rule, but I gave my name, said the priest was expecting me and that he'd said I could take all the pictures I wanted. I never knew name-dropping was so much fun!
Medieval geometric painting in a tomb archway |
The caretaker recognized my name from when the priest had told her about me, and from that moment on, we had a grand time, chatting, appreciating art, and taking a million photos.
The large Baroque (early seventeenth century) Cristo del Amparo is taken out in procession during Holy Week. |
Here we're at the right side of the apse, and you can get a sense of one of the things that makes San Claudio's column capitals so special: the unique play of its Asturias-inspired blind arches puts most of them at eye-level! You hardly have to crane your neck at all to see the sculptural wonders.
What we've all come to see: the twelfth-century Romanesque apse |
The truly deluxe elements here are the double blind archways on each side of the apse. Each side has two regular columns and one double column that finish nice and low so anyone can contemplate the details of their capitals.
And yes, the double columns have double capitals! The images in these capitals have been described as "disconcerting," which is probably why I think they're awesome.
Even in the first capital on the left, at traditional height, we can see there's something unusual going on. Mythic beasts in a Christian church? This may well be an inheritance from Classical tradition. These two griffons face each other and drink from the same cup. In such an attitude, scholars think they represent the guardians of the soul. I haven't found any information (so far) about the curious face above them.
On the side, there's an interesting crouching figure I haven't found an explanation for, either.
The first lower column capital on the left, which we can revel in, eye to eye, also seems a little odd: a lion biting grapevines. He's behaving in an unusual way for a lion because he's metaphorical. Christ is often represented by a lion in these early medieval works, and as we've seen in San Pedro de la Nave, the grapevines refer to Christ's blood, the Eucharist, and redemption for humanity. The lion guards the precious vines in the tight grip of his powerful jaws. No one is taking human redemption away from this lion!
The first double column capital respects the division into two spaces with two themes. On the left side, sirens (birds with female human heads) may represent the temptations of the flesh and pernicious doctrines, but since it shows up in the holiest part of the temple, it's likely to portray the human soul. The curlicues, as well as eliminating empty space, could show that the human soul is making a choice about which spiritual path to follow.
On the front, the siren has a distinctly Byzantine look about her face. Maybe it's the headdress, or perhaps her large eyes with pinpoint pupils. On the right, lions protect all that is sacred.
The lions meet at the corner by their heads and looking at the right side, it becomes clear that the lions are protecting what's sacred from some vicious wolves who bite the lions' tails. Wolves attacking lions? Remember that the lions are Christ, who is also the Lamb, and it makes a little more sense.
Sending our gaze upward, each double column in the center has directly above it a corbel at the end of the central half-circle arch. The characters are very similar, but the one on the left adopts a "thinker" type of pose while the one on the right is concentrating on supporting the arch with what appear to be hands specially adapted for the purpose. This one, or both, may or may not be Atlas.
Coming back down to eye level and following the apse, we find what appears to be a normal column capital with acanthus leaves, especially common in Zamora, where such leaves were as flamboyant as the Cistercian order ever got. But no. Here, too, the leaves have strange bulbs popping out of them, and a comely female figure on this side.
The other side features what appears to be a monkey, also with a bulb. The bulbs are likely the fruit of the tree. Could the woman be Eve? If this is the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, then the monkey represents Satan. Monkeys, as degraded versions of humans, are a typical way to represent the devil.
Across the apse, parallel with the unique Tree of Knowledge, we have a more expected representation of the Tree of Life, with leaves and birds very similar to the Eucharistic iconography of San Pedro de la Nave in the sima.
Farther toward the front, the other eye-level single column capital is also a tamer representation of Paradise. It's just as well, because the double capital on the right side gives us plenty to think about!
On the sides, fantastic creatures defy interpretation. On the right: a winged merman, or a flying dragon with a man's head, with a pointy elfin headdress.
On the left, a mermaid with luxurious locks of hair.
Some scholars have said that the male centaur is Christ, but I haven't been able to make the connection, myself. With his headdress, beard, and beady eyes, he shares the Byzantine look we saw across the way in the siren.
Maybe the last column capital, the high-up one on the right across from the griffons, which now seem perfectly normal, will pull these images together and send the visitor on her way with a clear head and a settled soul. We start well: on both sides, a majestic eagle spreads its wings. While their pairing makes it unlikely these represent John the Evangelist, eagles are a common sight in medieval Christian churches.
In front, we've returned to mythic themes. A man appears to me to be riding a beast that would not normally permit such activity. Most scholars interpret this finely detailed sculpture as Heracles (or Samson, in church lingo) wrestling with the Nemean lion. Note how his strong hands are forcing the jaws open. Here's one place where the lion is definitely not Christ.
San Claudio de Olivares is outside the city wall, and its artists brought some outré ideas to life. I thank them and the current clerical and lay staff of San Claudio for this unforgettable explosion of truly unique medievalness.
No comments:
Post a Comment